Skip to main content

STUDY RESOURCES

STUDY RESOURCES:

by JJD Peterson
Updated: 2019-08-22

This page will be dedicated to posting all of the resources that I have become familiar with in my research. This page is a new project, so please refresh the page for updated content.

THE APOCRYPHA PLUS JASHER, JUBILEES AND ENOCH:

- Yubel (or Jubilees)
- Chanoch (or Enoch)
- Yashar (or Jasher)
- 1st & 2nd Esdras
- Tobit
- Judith
- Additions to Esther
- Wisdom Of Solomon
- Ecclesiasticus
- Baruch
- Letter of Jeremiah
- Prayer of Azariah
- Susanna
- Bel and the Dragon
- Prayer of Manasseh
- 1st & 2nd Maccabees
- As well as the standard canon of scripture

Download the free app on Google Play with the following direct link:

CHANGES TO THE BIBLE:

THE JOHANNINE COMMA OF 1ST JOHN 5:6-8:

The Johannine Comma of 1st John 5:6-8 is a well documented error added to scripture around 1522 AD, which supported a widely growing trinity doctrine not found in older versions.
The following from the KJV bible is not in the original manuscripts:
"in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 8  And there are three that bear witness in earth,"
Without the Johannine Comma, this is how the KJV bible should read:
"1st John 5:6-8 6 This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth. 7 For there are three that bear record, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
As you can see, we restore a verse from being very trinity, back to its original, which has little or no trinity in it at all.

Still think the Bible is unaltered? Just one intentional error leads us to be on the lookout for others.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DO WE OFTEN TIMES AGREE TO THINGS WE KNOW VERY LITTLE ABOUT?

  DO WE OFTEN TIMES AGREE TO THINGS WE KNOW VERY LITTLE ABOUT? by #JJD_Peterson, Date: 2019-08-21 It's really no surprise that we may say "AMEN" to commands we don't understand, but resist the ones we do. For instance many Christians will agree that they shouldn't commit adultery, but when hearing the command, nod their head and say "Amen". But have they truly considered that if the woman is married a second time while the first husband remains alive, that they are living in adultery themselves, Romans 7:2-3, Exodus 22:16? For example, the woman at the well with Messiah, in John 4: Didn't Messiah say to her that she's had five husbands, and the one she had was not her husband? Do you think she may have also been ignorantly saying "Amen" to the command "Thou shalt not commit adultery" while ignorantly living in it? Or maybe she knew and continued transgressing. Is this just as the title says? We agree to th...

I AM REPENTING OF MY WRONG INTERPRETATION OF THE 2ND COMMANDMENT

I AM REPENTING OF MY WRONG INTERPRETATION OF THE 2ND COMMANDMENT by JJD Peterson Date: 2019-08-04 I AM TRULY SORRY FOR TEACHING THAT IMAGES WERE IDOLATRY THEMSELVES Many of you know that I had believed that using or creating images of creation in heaven, in earth, or in the waters under the earth, was committing idolatry against the Master's commandments, Exodus 20:4-6. Most of you who disagreed with me also disagreed with me that eating pig and shrimp was a sin also, though Leviticus 11 tells us directly not to eat them. You also fought against me with your Sunday worship replacing the Sabbath commandment in Exodus 20:8-11, of which still remains a command that most Christians still violate to this day. I really wasn't surprised you would refuse my now realizing a false interpretation of the image idolatry, because you were still justifying yourself to disobey the commandments. However, wrong is wrong, and I apologize for interpreting the scriptures wrongly here in Exo...